Trinity Operating Procedures - TOPs
TOP-IMPTL: Improving Tooling & Process
Rev: 12/06/2017
Scope: This procedure covers the actions taken by production management to improve tooling, material size and the forging process. It is divided up into three sections, any of which may pertain in a given instance. The first run of a die sometimes involves all three of the sections.
Procedure:
*"Foreman"
as used in
this procedure refers especially to the
Production Supervisor
or
Leadman, but in some
cases may involve VP-Manufacturing
**Die Impression Cast Approval Letter will eventually replace Dies
info, but until then information
entered in both programs.
STEP
WHO
WHEN
INFO TO USE
WHAT TO DO
TO
IMPROVE MATERIAL DIAMETER OR CUT
a1
Foreman*
As
determine the material size
used on a job could
be improved
Personal
observation; possibly
discussion with
Forging Engineer;
Tooling
Program
Change
die info and notify
Forging Engineer
of steel changes needed via e-mail or IPR
a2
Forging Engineer
Upon
receiving notification and report via email
Email
notification from
Foreman regarding steel
changes needed. Tooling
Program;
Verify
feasibility of material
size specified on
message; if okay, update information in M2M, Tooling Program;
if size feasible (unavailable or uneconomical) resolve material size
with
Foreman*
TO IMPROVE
(OR REPAIR) TOOLING
b1
Foreman*
Upon
determining that tooling
needs improvement
(either because it has deteriorated from use or because means of
improving quality, reliability or economics have been identified)
Dies,
flashings, sample parts,
QC reports, etc.
Determine
the extent of
modification needed to the
die or other tooling
b2
Foreman*
If
change can easily be made
in forge shop by
Foreman
Decision
from step b1
Make
change to die; if the
problem was due to the
way the die was (re)sunk, or is new idea, provide Forging Engineer and
Die Shop Supervisor a Die Improvement Slip
b3
Foreman*
If
change requires Die Shop
help
Decision
from step b1
Have
dies or other tooling
pulled out and sent to
Die Shop; tell Forging Engineer,
Die Shop Supervisor or
Die Shop Leadman
what is required
b4
Die Shop Leadman, or Die
Specialist
As
requested by Foreman*
Verbal
request
Make
changes as quickly as
possible then notify
production (if repair looks to take longer than one shift, or if it
must be sent to an outside supplier, notify Foreman of delay); if work
is an attempt to improve tooling, give the Forging
Engineer a Die
Improvement Slip
and/or a marked up Print
or Die
Layout showing the changes clearly.
b5
Foreman*
After
repaired die returned by
Die Shop
Notification
from Die Shop
Check
changes to die.
b6
Foreman*
If
change requires die resink
or rework by outside
die shop
Decision
from step b1
Have
dies or other tooling
pulled out and sent to
Die Shop; tell Forging Engineer (or
Die Shop Leadman what is
required and provide IPR
to Forging
Engineer via
e-mail, with a
copy to Customer Service
Representative, VP-Manufacturing
, and
Die Shop Supervisor.
b7
Engineer
or
Die Shop Leadman
As
requested by Foreman*
IPR
Verify
that die does need
resinking; if not, get
back with Foreman and discuss proper actions to take; if verify that
die does need resinking, do so per TOP-SINKR, get
estimate of time frame and notify Foreman and Production Scheduler of
delay.
b8
Engineering
Manager
Upon
receiving Die
Improvement Slip
Die
Improvement Slip; own
judgment
Review
Die
Improvement Slip,
possibly after die
change has been tried in production, and if agree that the improvement
needs to be remembered at the next resink, put in file with Die Layout
in Engineering File;
take whatever action deemed appropriate
TO IMPROVE
PROCESS (SUCH AS HAMMER PREFERENCE OR BLOW PATTERN)
c1
Foreman*
As
identify different hammer
preference for jobs
Own
ideas, others' suggestions
Change
hammer preference in M2M
c2
Any
manager (typically Foreman
or QC Supervisor)
Upon
having suggestions to
improve next run of job
(or to record problems to watch for)
Own
ideas, others' suggestions
Notify Forging
Engineer of
Traveler
changes and
make appropriate necessary updates in M2M.
c3
QC
Supervisor
Upon
notification of change to
the Traveler
Notes
received on required
changes to Traveler
Update
Traveler
to reflect any
suggested areas of
concern on the next run
Revision history:
Release Date |
Description of Change |
Owner |
Approver |
12/06/2017 |
Updated to comply with revised Quality Manual and new TOPs format. |
Tim Ellis |
Todd Sheppard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|